Showing posts with label startups. Show all posts
Showing posts with label startups. Show all posts

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Peter Thiel Speaks at Columbia: Contrarian, Aspergers and One-of-a-Kind



PayPal founder and Facebook investor opened up to an auditorium full of Columbia students last night.

His most compelling observations seemed to be that conformity is the enemy of Entrepreneurship and the high occurrence of Asberger types in the Entrepreneur camp. He also noted that capitalists are anti-competitive in the sense that they are always looking for monopolies - but you already knew that!

It would be hard to draw everyman lessons from what he said, except that when it comes to Entrepreneurship, being out of step with everyone else may be the first sign that you are on the right track.

It's a tricky lesson because being a contrarian doesn't also make you right. But Thiel has made billions by placing big bets on those rare people who can seem wrong but also be so defensibly right. Facebook was unfundable for its first two years - in both Boston and New York - but Thiel wasted no time writing the first $500,000 check before anyone else did.

His craziest bet - at least according to his limited partners - was Elon Musk's Space X. Aside from the fact that he knew Musk as a fellow PayPal founder, when he looked deeper into the business, it made a ton of sense. They had a champion at NASA who was happy to order rockets and who also got Uncle Sam to pay up front. SpaceX, as it turns out, was a great cash flow deal hiding under space exploration! As for PayPal, they were really out to create a new currency but tat the same were responding to a need created by eBay - how to make online payments to individuals.

On a personal level, Thiel is a Stanford grad, lawyer and chessmaster, who hated lawfirms and had an early life crisis that drove him to the "wild west" of the Internet.

If you had to draw an inference from his somewhat rambling philosophy of investing - what he looks for is something like this: a well-structured renegade thinker who has taken on a challenge that could go big and that has no easy competitor.

This sounds obvious enough until you realize that few investors go with renegade because they tend to go with what they know and understand. But we all know that the next big thing never is. As for the renegades themselves, let's just say they are not the most outgoing people either. Hence the title of the book One to Zero - as in one of a kind.

Fortunately, there are more conventional ways to understand Investors. You can get an insight on the rules and mindset of the Investor community from my forthcoming book Are You Fundable? which will be released - finally! - in early October.




Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Startupalooza Finalist in Crain's: Bustripping

Bustripping - one of the 4 finalists at last week's Startupalooza is featured in the current Crain's Business Magazine.

A previous winner, CreativeWorx was featured in Forbes.

Startupalooza has emerged as the leading mediacentric event for startups where every plan is rated in detail by VCs so the entrepreneurs can learn how to improve their Fundability options.

Here are the results of the past Startupalooza at Mercy College in NYC.


QoL Devices, LLC  - Mobile based Respiratory Training and Therapy device.


The Finalists were:
Bustripping - "Kayak" for city-to-city bus riders
Studio7 - a music enabling technology and training for the disabled
WhisperShout - an app for telling stories with video


Average VC Scores






ENTREPRENEUR
Fundability
Idea
Presentation
Execution
bustripping
19.6
6.6
6.4
6.6
QoL Devices, LLC
19.8
7.6
7.4
7.6
Studio7Music
19
6.8
5.4
5
WhisperShout
20
7
6.4
6


Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Trump Puts the Clown in Crowdfunding

Thanks to Donald Trump and the extraordinary spectacle played out at Trump Tower yesterday, we just got a glimpse of crowdfunding as a nightmare: people crammed against each other as they clawed the air for MONEY. 

As Trump put it, he wanted to take crowdfunding away from "Brooklyn hipsters." That he did, as a money-maddened crowd sprinkled with street people, brayed for bucks.

The site he is promoting, Fundanything.com, which is actually managed by his old pal, Learning Annex's Bill Zanker, borrows from Indiegogo.com. It accepts all comers and charges 9% if you don't make your goal and 5% if you do (vs. Indiegogo's 9% and 4%). 

The site is open to all comers and there is no community follow-up or any kind of vetting of deals. 

The only bright side to this picture is that Trump is offering to fund a choice few projects and so the publicity may bring some attention to other projects on the home page. 

If you are sorry you missed yesterday's spectacle, do not fret, the two expect to do live events around the country on the theory that it will bring more attention to the projects. The reality is likely to be more money stampedes - the ugly realization of our jobless recovery and our fascination with entrepreneurship-for-everyone.

Nevertheless, it is part of a trend. Last week, we reported that Shark Tank's Barbara Corcoran joined the board of RockthePost.com, a pioneering equity crowdfunding site featured on our podcast, The Entrepreneur Show. 

So - do we continue to be amazed at the miracle of crowdfunding - the wisdom of the public as it puts its trust in the ideas of a good few? What the JOBS act is about to turn it into a wealth-sharing vehicle for the rest of us?

Or, are we about to see it transformed into a freakshow to amuse the rich whenever they feel like sprinkling bills before beggars? A massive joke where people compete against each with sob stories or half-baked ideas in search for suckers. A high tech way of washing your windshield?

The answer depends on which side of the velvet rope you were standing last Wednesday at Trump Tower.


Additional stories in the Verge and Techcrunch.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Are You Fundable? Part 1


Section 1 - Summary 

The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Winning Over Investors
by Alan Brody

After 12+ years of evaluating pitches and helping entrepreneurs raise money, we have put together a book of rules on what it takes to get funding. What Investors look for and how to make your plan fundable. By looking through the prism of Angel Investor wisdom. It tells you how to:
• evaluate an idea
• find the right investor
• build sales
• attract sponsors
• pivot, reconstruct or know when to fold

At the heart of the book is this idea: you understand Start-Ups by seeing them through the eyes of investors. If you know how they handicap you, then you not only know how to get ahead but which race you should be in.

Not all Start-Ups are the same. You already knew that, but do you know what sets them apart in the minds of investors? When you do, you can increase your chances of success dramatically.

Why Ask “Am I Fundable?”
The key reason to ask is that it forces you to think about your enterprise from the outside in. When you do that, you get out of your own spin zone and into the mindset of real customers and investors.

Here is what you will discover:

1.     There is a hierarchy of Start-Ups - you need to understand where you belong on that line-up.
2.     Customers and Investors may be  connected to each other but often have very different points of view – what makes a customer want to buy your product or service can be different from why an investor would want to write you a check.
3.     All businesses have to adjust their much loved ideas to the reality of the marketplace.                                                                                                                                                                                             
4.     When you know what you have and how it is really perceived, you can calibrate your message for each audience: investors, customers and potential partners. You can also realistically determine how to spend your – pursuing customers or investors in just the right measure, instead of wasting time doing both incorrectly.

THE MAP OF ENTREPRENEUR LAND….MINES

The Start-Up Hierarchy: What Kind of Entrepreneur Are You?

The heart of Are You Fundable? is the idea of a hierarchy of Start-Ups and then a matching taxonomy of investors. Investors handicap you according to your status. If you pitch an idea that is inconsistent with your status you will probably lose credibility. Without credibility, you don’t get funded or even attract business.

The Hierarchy of Entrepreneurs

What is a Serial Entrepreneur?
A serial entrepreneur is someone who has started one or more businesses. These Kings of the Start-Up realm can sit by the phone and investors will offer them money just in case they come up with an idea.

What is a Semi-Serial Entrepreneur?
At the next rung are serial entrepreneurs with a mixed record.

The Pedigreed Start-up
At the next level down in the hierarchy are what we like to call the Pedigreed Start-ups. I can say anecdotally, that these people seem to get the lion’s share of the Start-Up money. Almost anyone with 10 years in an industry could make a case if only they found the marketable idea within their domain of expertise and understood the “rules.”

Pedigreed Start-ups are people who have:
• 5 or more years of domain experience in a field (10 years seems to be the sweet spot)
• have identified a key market with a critically needed product in their field
• have the developer team in place with the product ready or at least a working demo
• have the customers who want or need to buy it

Not-So Pedigreed
Here are some of the traps this kind of entrepreneur can fall into. Investors look out for this and if you are not careful, you can disqualify yourself:
• Salaryman/woman: never been an entrepreneur before
No skin in the game – as in not having your own money at risk, is negatively viewed. 
Tied to a paycheck: the risk with this type of entrepreneur is that they could be more interested in finding a paycheck than in taking on the struggle of launching a business. • Mixed age team. Having an older manager and a very young developer raises generational issues.
• Acting like an exec. Don’t be aloof, you’re supposed to hustle or it will seem like you never left the previous company.
You were fired. Tricky and best left to the later conversation but if you were fired for being an entrepreneur, as long as you were one in the past is not a bad story.
The worst sin: coming up with an idea that has nothing to do with your previous line of business.

Moonshots, Up-and-Comers and Career-Enders
At the bottom level are the youngest and the oldest. These are the folks who come to our really early stage Start-Up events called Startupalooza. They are the heart and soul of the TV show “Shark Tank” and they are the biggest winners when they get it but overall, the most consistent group of losers. They either reach the moon or fizzle out trying.

1. The greatest Start-Ups are usually founded by people under 27 Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Netscape and so on.
2. Only the young can invent the defining ideas of their generation which is by definition, an untapped market.
2. They can afford to take the greatest risks since they have the least to lose. The right person is also adaptable, able to struggle, accept loss and still recover.
3. They appeal to the vicarious reinvention psychology of Angel Investors.
4. Young people who have these qualities – even if the idea is wrong or the investor doesn’t invest in their deal – are a kind of currency that Angels like to “trade” with each other.
5. They have nowhere to go but up.

Let’s Give them Something to Tweet About
The way investors find out about great Start-Ups is that people talk.

The Up-and-Comer
Most Start-Ups have a good idea that is essentially a twist on other ideas in play.

The Older Player
If you are over 50, you can pretty much forget about getting Angel money. Angel Investors will probably deny this but I am sure they will also want you to believe they are not a day over 50 either.

The Going Enterprise that Seeks Growth
For a company already showing profits, to bring on investors is usually a double edge sword. Their actual profits tend to put a cap on their valuations.

Scalability
This is more challenging than it seems. Do you have a formula that with nothing more than the addition of capital, will generate more sales?

Transformative Element  Not just projections,
--> something that the changes the business paradigm.

What Impresses Investors
How to Improve the Way Investors Rank You

Get a Lead Investor or Champion or Make Friends with Serial Entrepreneurs
If you don’t have a lead investor or at least an investor who introduces you to other investors, or a serial entrepreneur, the next best thing is a fellow entrepreneur.

Thumb on the Scale and other Anti-competitive Ideas
They want to know if you have a thumb on the scale – a special advantage that others don’t have and can’t see.
 
Patents
A defensible patent is prized by investors, but any patent along with business momentum carries value because it has the possible effect of warding off competition.

Barrier to Entry
If you don’t have a patent then you want to convince investors that you have some type of barrier like special equipment or rarefied knowledge that competitors either can’t get.

First Mover Advantage
This is essentially what Amazon had as the first online bookseller. The reality is not so much that the first in a market as much as the first credible player in the market wins.
What Investors Don’t Want

Lifestyle Business – the Big No No
What they cannot abide, what the live in fear of is the lifestyle business. Be careful of phrases that suggest this: like having a steady business, being a consultant or living off sales.

What Investors Fear
 
Settling (A Tribute of Sorts, to Steve Jobs)
Even the idea of selling out too soon – or settling will upset an investor.

The Zombie Business
Never quite taking off but never quite dying either. You always need more money because you’re always just about to break .

Failed Execution/Failed Idea
Fix it and then pitch….

The Tells – How you Know You Need Help!
a.      “If we just had 5% of Google’s (or Apple/Facebook/put_big company_name here) market we would be worth a billion Sure!
b.     We need the money for sales and marketing. When you ask for money in order to sell you’ve just told them you don't have the confidence to sell yourself.
c.     We have no competition
Hosni Mubarak used to say the same thing about his Egyptian regime and for 40 years he was right. Then along came Facebook. There is always competition.
d.     Our competition is Microsoft, eBay and Google - but they don’t get it.
Nor do the investors.

What kinds of deals investors are looking for?  
 

What Investors DO Want

The rule of thumb for fast-rising business in a massive, emerging market is a defensible business in a sector that is likely to double every year for 5 years in at least a billion dollar market. They also need to know that it is scalable through capital. 



Are You Fundable?


eBook or Print
Part 2 discusses fundable ideas like anticipation, natural progression, aggregation, undercutting. How ideas are measured and rated. How to pitch them, how to value and how to move to the next level.

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Report from the June Agile Funding – Agile Hiring Event

By Alan Brody

Speakers: Ian Sigalow, Partner, Greycroft Partners, Stephen Brotman Managing Director, Greenhill & Co, Graham Lawlor, Founder, Ultralight Startups

As we continue our Job Generation series of matching senior execs to Start-Ups, we had the June event to take stock - from the VCs perspective. Our featured speakers, 2 active New York investors spilled the beans on the money side while our dean of agile Start-Ups kicked in with confessions from the entrepreneur side.

The result is an eye-opener - and if you are looking to boost your Start-up or work with one, pay attention.

1.    Very few companies get funded.

2.    Angel-funded companies still have to grow to the next level – there is a very small chance of a follow-on round if you do not grow dramatically

3.    Your best chance for breaking through is by building a savvy, connected team that includes some industry veterans. But you need to make it worth their while to come over to your side.


What we learned from the two VCs who do $500K - $2 million deals, is that you need to have high-growth potential in a rapidly growing marketplace in order to have a chance at funding. Then, the best way to get their attention is to have other people in the industry rave about you because word gets around in this community’s echo chamber. Getting a savvy player on board can help make the connection and will help you when they come calling.

The problem is that very few companies qualify for this kind of funding. Some get lucky and find an investor of one kind or another. This is not always to their ultimate benefit if they don’t use the money wisely and they don’t grow - but at least they have raised capital.

For everyone else, listen up, there are still plenty of opportunities. Some part of this is domain knowledge and experience – if you really know your business and you’re savvy, you will generally prevail. But a certain kind of faith and positive flexible vision is also key. Why - because you have to believe that you can prove yourself with whatever resources you have. Money is not everything. Too much of it can kill a company. Also, most start-ups find their real business or revenue opportunity down the road and it is usually starkly different from what they anticipated. So, being able to change direction to catch the right wind is key and investors have to feel comfortable that you will find that wind and adjust accordingly. Passionate amateurs tend not to do that.

Luckily for us, Ian Sigalow, a partner at Greycroft, LLC, Alan Patricof’s venture fund was on hand to break it down.

The single biggest thing he looks for is market size. If it’s not in the billions and growing rapidly, don’t bother. They need to make 10x within 5-10 years. In reality, they are searching for deals that are more likely to make them 100x. Seriously, is that you? If not how could you steer your enterprise toward that goal?

First, don’t be desperate. It takes at least 3 months to structure a deal usually longer. Your credibility is a huge issue. This is true even if you are the first to a huge new market. Who you are and what you bring to the table a big issues because if you fail to execute, there are so many others waiting in the wings to jump on your market.

That is one of the reasons that VC money tends to go to serial entrepreneurs. People who have done this before and succeeded are always preferred. They get the big bucks, the quick deals and even have the right to do a “me-too” company just because it is assumed they can execute.

If this is your first start-up you need help. You need to create buzz and then you need to have at lest two VCs looking at your deal to raise values and create a sense of closure. Otherwise, you wind up with meaningless phone calls, useless meetings and 90 day lockups. (Preferred no-shopping clause is 30 – 45 days)

VCs often refer promising companies to angels if they are pre-revenue and still working on their product development. That is usually a good thing. However, when VCs do their own Angel round that has its own special danger because unless you succeed spectacularly you are not likely to get follow on rounds from anyone other than the VC who may be even more disappointed than everyone else when you don’t beat projections.

[For the record:
Series A requires revenue and 3-4 customers
Series B 10 – 20 million valuation
Series C $100MM+]

Valuations – so here’s a big secret – go for a convertible note. Angels will ways try to hold you to a valuation. The lower the better. VCs on the other hand are more likely to prefer that you took a convertible note at a discount to the series “A” valuation – typically 25%. That means the company is more accurately valued and they know they are getting the best deal while you, the entrepreneur get to keep more of your company to sell to the VC. This is where find out how angelic your investors are – by whether or not they will accept the convertible note.

Know thy VC: do your homework. Know what kinds of companies they fund and why. Funds must be also be active – with the economic hiccups, many are walking dead.



Steve Brotman, the Managing Partner at Greenhill SAVP was quick to concur and we got to hear about his investments. Once again, your research is everything. VCs have areas of interest and their own theories of the marketplace. If you understand how they think you can determine who to go to and how to present your idea. Greenhill, and to a large extent, Greycroft, favors technology platforms that help automate services. Advertising can be transformed this way, so can financial products, even search engine optimization. If your product does something spectacular in those areas, and the market is getting B-I-G, they will probably want to hear from you. Or better yet, hear from a few of your credible fans.

What you need to know about VCs is that most exits are M&A driven at between $50 – 100 million. They want to see a minimum 10x and preferably 100x returns, so you can see how sharp the numbers have to be to get their interest. On the other hand, Steve spilled the beans on negotiating from the book “Hacking the Human Mind”: time pressure, lack of information and perceived opportunity can make otherwise intelligent people do strange things.

[For the record: Snapshot of Greenhill Investments
5 year old company growing faster than Twitter.
Medical metadata co. for testing.
Yellowjackets to consolidate IMs on trading floor.]

Graham Lawlor
Graham is the founder of Ultralight Startups which is a lively forum for the kinds of agile companies that are sprouting everywhere. Graham quotes the patron saint of the movement, Steve Blank whose book, “4 Steps to Epiphany” lays out the case for these companies. They key issue is that it doesn’t take much to start a company today, whereas ten years ago it cost plenty. Making them work is lot like using the steps taken by savvy corporation in a successful product roll out. The problem is that everyone seems to be starting a company because they can, and in the noise, some key issues are forgotten. The point about a successful roll out is having something customers seem to want and not just something you are able to make. So step one is having a minimum viable product. You learn from early adopters what they really want and pivot your development around their actual needs and desires of these people. Then you build your customer base with leases and marketing and then you build a company.

That’s the theory. In practice, the market throws a lot of curve balls and the interest of the early adopters may be very different from the later adopters. So being nimble and agile and listening to the market and also knowing when not to listen is a whole other issues.

Bottom line: anytime there seem to be a lot of buzz as a promising market emerges and you get people to talk about you, investors will come calling.


Start-Ups Presenting
Hal Charych has RFID automated gates for ski resorts. Generally seemed like it was a great idea but ought to be aimed at much broader markets. New York is not a ski investors market.

Alex Combos, EventNow. This site enables event planners to put their events out to bidding rather than having to go chasing after venues for pricing. Seems like a great idea but there are many big name like eVite that seem to be lurking in the wings.

Executives
James Mancuso, a former executive and CTO at Platform Computing Inc. a, Financial Services company in NY gave these Start-Ups helpful advice about growth and positioning.


COMING  JULY 28 – The Exploding eBook/iPad Marketplace










Thursday, May 6, 2010

Report from Job Generation II - May 2010

Speakers:Will Porteous, General Partner, RRE Ventures
Paul Borgese, Digital Strategist, AP
Graham Lawlor, Ultra Light Start-Ups

Hosted by Alan Brody
 

[Job Generation is covered again on NY1.]
Job Generation II unfolded yesterday at Herrick, Feinstein, LLP on Park Ave. Now with a revised format and your host Alan Brody, back at the helm, this event moved at a quick pace showcasing new business ideas and interesting executive crossfire.
Job Gen is where Executives have the chance pitch Entrepreneurs with their ability to manage, rethink, grow, finance or otherwise get a Start-Up off the ground.
There is always a VC in residence - in this case Will Porteous of RRE Ventures - and a couple of sidekicks, Graham Lawlor, Founder of Ultralight Startups and Paul Borgese, a digital strategist with Associated Press.
This new format moves quickly with entrepreneurs not only being able to tell their story to the investment community but also to find out what a brain trust of savvy execs would make of their enterprises. For most of them it was invaluable advice.
How many Start-Ups understand the true value of their company? How many know how to position it or who to sell their services or products to. Our savvy group weighed in with enough good insight to improve their chances of growing their businesses and raising capital.
We began with a quick story from Tommaso Trionfi of Lusyte who helped a social media start-up, running out of money, to raise what today is an unheard of amount of money - close to $1 million - simply by spending time with them and reshaping their business plan.
On that note we moved into our presenters:
Bahar Gidwani of CSRhub.com was advised to become a kind of Moodies of socially responsible companies and consider bringing on a famous spokesperson in lieu of or as a way to raise money.
Paul Orlando of chatfe.com, a voice chat system, was advised to take the enterprise route - selling it to companies that need to call up for internal advice between employees.
Autoslash’s Jonathan Weinberg, a discount car rental booking service was advised to find a travel partner.
Dora Tarver’s e-projectmanager.com ran into some crossfire from execs who saw her as competing with the giant Project Manger’s Institute. But execs in the audience saw a difference picture and were encouraged by her 16,000 project manager subscribers worldwide. Adding a social media angle seemed like an obvious and potentially lucrative route.
ConeXus’s Hunter Cohen, a kind of behavioral targeting method by tracking social media relationships, was advised to find a media partner - no small task.
The executives on the panel voted the Most Valuable Players were:
Dan Cohen, as Chief Executive Officer, clearthink.com
Laura McCann Ramsey, as Chief Marketing Officer. Wsywygllc.com
Other participants included: Bill Reinisch, XIV River; Martha Lorini, Bill Simon and Paul Wegener, waveberg.com